This part 10 has FFmpeg screenshots from the output WebM files from both h264 and h265 for CRF values 15, 22 and 30 with -cpu-used 0 to 5 and -deadline good & realtime.

Part 1 was h264 -deadline good.

Part 2 was h264 -deadline realtime.

Part 3 was h264 with -deadline good compared to -deadline realtime.

Part 4 was h265 -deadline good.

Part 5 was h265 -deadline realtime.

Part 6 was h265 with -deadline good compared to -deadline realtime.

Part 7 was both h264 and h265 (hevc) -deadline good compared to -deadline realtime.

Part 8 was averages when grouping h264 and h265 parameters.

Part 9 the findings.

Screenshots

Click image to view full resolution

There is very little difference due to the still shot nature.